Claude Skill MartBrowse skillsQuick linesLearn by videoTerminal guideWhat is a Skill?
Back to list

Scholar Evaluation

Runs developmental, evidence-traceable reviews of papers, protocols and research ideas, plus local audits of low-stakes assessment rubrics.

EducationAdvanced33,0303,248AI score 9/10Last updated: Aug 9, 2026

What it does

  • Reviews a scholarly work (paper, draft, protocol, literature synthesis, research idea) qualitatively first; optional scores only describe how submitted evidence maps to a predeclared bounded rubric.
  • Bans prestige and proxy metrics — Impact Factor, h-index, citation counts, altmetrics, venue or institutional prestige — and the rubric validator rejects such criteria.
  • Provides an 8-step workflow: confirm allowed use → define the construct → validate the rubric → build traceable evidence records → rate independently → run local quality checks → synthesize findings → human committee review.
  • Ships standard-library Python CLIs for score calculation, traceability checks, inter-rater agreement, weight sensitivity, and a fail-closed process checklist — all local, no network, credentials, or external models.
  • Hard-refuses consequential uses: hiring, promotion, tenure, admissions, funding, prizes, or discipline, and never ranks people.

Who it's for

  • Researchers and PhD students who want systematic pre-submission or lab-internal peer review.
  • Research-integrity or assessment officers auditing whether a review process documents validity, fairness, privacy, and governance.
  • PIs replacing metric-driven judgments with evidence-based, developmental feedback.

Example uses

  1. Feed a pre-submission manuscript and get criterion-level comments that separate observed evidence, interpretation, missing, and not_applicable.
  2. Run scripts/validate_rubric.py on a homemade rubric to catch citation-count or venue-prestige criteria.
  3. Load three raters' CSV into summarize_agreement.py, inspect agreement, and redesign the criteria that raters disagree on.

· · · Install guide · · ·

Try it now, no install

Paste this into Claude to use the skill without installing anything.

Read the instructions in this file and follow them to help me:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/HEAD/skills/scholar-evaluation/SKILL.md

What I want: (describe your task here)

If Claude can't open the link, open it yourself and paste the contents instead.

If it works for you, download the ZIP below and install it. Then it runs on its own — no pasting each time.

Install in the Claude app (no terminal)
  1. Download the ZIP with the button below.
  2. In Claude, open Settings → Capabilities and turn on 'Code execution and file creation'. (one time)
  3. Go to Customize → Skills → + → 'Upload a skill' and upload the ZIP.
Download ZIP
Install in Claude Code

Let Claude do it — paste this into Claude Code

Install the skill I found on Claude Skill Mart.
Copy the skills/scholar-evaluation folder from the GitHub repo K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills into my ~/.claude/skills/scholar-evaluation/.
When it's done, tell me in one line what this skill can do.

Install with a command instead

git clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills.git /tmp/sas && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r /tmp/sas/skills/scholar-evaluation ~/.claude/skills/

This is a third-party skill. Check the source repository before installing.

  1. Open a terminal and confirm Python 3.11+: python3 --version.
  2. Clone the repository: git clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills.git /tmp/sas
  3. Create the skills folder: mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
  4. Copy just this skill: cp -r /tmp/sas/skills/scholar-evaluation ~/.claude/skills/
  5. Restart Claude Code and ask: "Use the scholar-evaluation skill to review my draft."
  6. Before any organizational use, read references/responsible_assessment.md first.
  7. To run the CLIs, fill the JSON/CSV templates in assets/ with pseudonymous IDs only — never raw applications, CVs, or reviewer identities.